1952 Ford Crestline vs. 2001 Land Rover Range Rover
To start off, 2001 Land Rover Range Rover is newer by 49 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1952 Ford Crestline. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1952 Ford Crestline would be higher. At 4,600 cc (8 cylinders), 2001 Land Rover Range Rover is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2001 Land Rover Range Rover (222 HP) has 114 more horse power than 1952 Ford Crestline. (108 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2001 Land Rover Range Rover should accelerate faster than 1952 Ford Crestline.
Because 2001 Land Rover Range Rover is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1952 Ford Crestline. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2001 Land Rover Range Rover will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 2001 Land Rover Range Rover has automatic transmission and 1952 Ford Crestline has manual transmission. 1952 Ford Crestline will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2001 Land Rover Range Rover will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
| 1952 Ford Crestline | 2001 Land Rover Range Rover | |
| Make | Ford | Land Rover |
| Model | Crestline | Range Rover |
| Year Released | 1952 | 2001 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 3929 cc | 4600 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | V |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 108 HP | 222 HP |
| Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
| Vehicle Length | 5030 mm | 4450 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1890 mm | 1820 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2940 mm | 2550 mm |
