1952 Ford Crestline vs. 2001 Opel Meriva
To start off, 2001 Opel Meriva is newer by 49 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1952 Ford Crestline. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1952 Ford Crestline would be higher. At 3,929 cc (8 cylinders), 1952 Ford Crestline is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2001 Opel Meriva (123 HP @ 5800 RPM) has 15 more horse power than 1952 Ford Crestline. (108 HP @ 4500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2001 Opel Meriva should accelerate faster than 1952 Ford Crestline. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1952 Ford Crestline weights approximately 90 kg more than 2001 Opel Meriva.
Because 1952 Ford Crestline is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1952 Ford Crestline. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2001 Opel Meriva, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1952 Ford Crestline | 2001 Opel Meriva | |
| Make | Ford | Opel |
| Model | Crestline | Meriva |
| Year Released | 1952 | 2001 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 3929 cc | 1796 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 108 HP | 123 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4500 RPM | 5800 RPM |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Vehicle Weight | 1480 kg | 1390 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5030 mm | 4050 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1890 mm | 1700 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2940 mm | 2740 mm |
