1952 Ford Crestline vs. 2001 Volkswagen Lupo
To start off, 2001 Volkswagen Lupo is newer by 49 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1952 Ford Crestline. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1952 Ford Crestline would be higher. At 3,929 cc (8 cylinders), 1952 Ford Crestline is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2001 Volkswagen Lupo (148 HP @ 4000 RPM) has 40 more horse power than 1952 Ford Crestline. (108 HP @ 4500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2001 Volkswagen Lupo should accelerate faster than 1952 Ford Crestline. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1952 Ford Crestline weights approximately 162 kg more than 2001 Volkswagen Lupo.
Because 1952 Ford Crestline is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1952 Ford Crestline. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2001 Volkswagen Lupo, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1952 Ford Crestline | 2001 Volkswagen Lupo | |
Make | Ford | Volkswagen |
Model | Crestline | Lupo |
Year Released | 1952 | 2001 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3929 cc | 1597 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 108 HP | 148 HP |
Engine RPM | 4500 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 1480 kg | 1318 kg |
Wheelbase Size | 2940 mm | 2520 mm |