1952 Ford Crestline vs. 2002 Toyota Corolla
To start off, 2002 Toyota Corolla is newer by 50 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1952 Ford Crestline. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1952 Ford Crestline would be higher. At 3,929 cc (8 cylinders), 1952 Ford Crestline is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2002 Toyota Corolla (114 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 6 more horse power than 1952 Ford Crestline. (108 HP @ 4500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2002 Toyota Corolla should accelerate faster than 1952 Ford Crestline. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1952 Ford Crestline weights approximately 460 kg more than 2002 Toyota Corolla.
Because 1952 Ford Crestline is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1952 Ford Crestline. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2002 Toyota Corolla, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1952 Ford Crestline | 2002 Toyota Corolla | |
Make | Ford | Toyota |
Model | Crestline | Corolla |
Year Released | 1952 | 2002 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3929 cc | 1398 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 108 HP | 114 HP |
Engine RPM | 4500 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 1480 kg | 1020 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5030 mm | 4390 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1890 mm | 1720 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2940 mm | 2610 mm |