1952 Ford Crestline vs. 2003 Mitsubishi eK
To start off, 2003 Mitsubishi eK is newer by 51 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1952 Ford Crestline. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1952 Ford Crestline would be higher. At 3,929 cc (8 cylinders), 1952 Ford Crestline is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1952 Ford Crestline weights approximately 690 kg more than 2003 Mitsubishi eK.
Because 1952 Ford Crestline is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1952 Ford Crestline. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2003 Mitsubishi eK, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 2003 Mitsubishi eK has automatic transmission and 1952 Ford Crestline has manual transmission. 1952 Ford Crestline will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2003 Mitsubishi eK will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
| 1952 Ford Crestline | 2003 Mitsubishi eK | |
| Make | Ford | Mitsubishi |
| Model | Crestline | eK |
| Year Released | 1952 | 2003 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 3929 cc | 656 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 3 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 108 HP | 0 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
| Vehicle Weight | 1480 kg | 790 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5030 mm | 3400 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1890 mm | 1480 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2940 mm | 2350 mm |
