1952 Ford Crestline vs. 2003 Subaru R2
To start off, 2003 Subaru R2 is newer by 51 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1952 Ford Crestline. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1952 Ford Crestline would be higher. At 3,929 cc (8 cylinders), 1952 Ford Crestline is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1952 Ford Crestline (108 HP @ 4500 RPM) has 63 more horse power than 2003 Subaru R2. (45 HP @ 6000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1952 Ford Crestline should accelerate faster than 2003 Subaru R2. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1952 Ford Crestline weights approximately 640 kg more than 2003 Subaru R2. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2003 Subaru R2 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1952 Ford Crestline. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2003 Subaru R2 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1952 Ford Crestline | 2003 Subaru R2 | |
| Make | Ford | Subaru |
| Model | Crestline | R2 |
| Year Released | 1952 | 2003 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 3929 cc | 658 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 108 HP | 45 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4500 RPM | 6000 RPM |
| Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
| Vehicle Weight | 1480 kg | 840 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5030 mm | 3400 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1890 mm | 1480 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2940 mm | 2370 mm |
