1952 Ford Crestline vs. 2004 Marcos TS
To start off, 2004 Marcos TS is newer by 52 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1952 Ford Crestline. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1952 Ford Crestline would be higher. At 3,929 cc (8 cylinders), 1952 Ford Crestline is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Marcos TS (177 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 69 more horse power than 1952 Ford Crestline. (108 HP @ 4500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2004 Marcos TS should accelerate faster than 1952 Ford Crestline. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1952 Ford Crestline weights approximately 405 kg more than 2004 Marcos TS.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1952 Ford Crestline | 2004 Marcos TS | |
Make | Ford | Marcos |
Model | Crestline | TS |
Year Released | 1952 | 2004 |
Engine Size | 3929 cc | 2544 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 108 HP | 177 HP |
Engine RPM | 4500 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Vehicle Weight | 1480 kg | 1075 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5030 mm | 4010 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1890 mm | 1690 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2940 mm | 2230 mm |