1952 Ford Crestline vs. 2006 Ford Ranger
To start off, 2006 Ford Ranger is newer by 54 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1952 Ford Crestline. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1952 Ford Crestline would be higher. At 3,929 cc (8 cylinders), 1952 Ford Crestline is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1952 Ford Crestline (108 HP @ 4500 RPM) has 0 more horse power than 2006 Ford Ranger. (108 HP @ 3500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1952 Ford Crestline should accelerate faster than 2006 Ford Ranger. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1952 Ford Crestline weights approximately 2 kg more than 2006 Ford Ranger. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1952 Ford Crestline | 2006 Ford Ranger | |
| Make | Ford | Ford |
| Model | Crestline | Ranger |
| Year Released | 1952 | 2006 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 3929 cc | 2499 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 3 valves |
| Horse Power | 108 HP | 108 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4500 RPM | 3500 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Vehicle Weight | 1480 kg | 1478 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5030 mm | 4670 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2940 mm | 3010 mm |
