1952 Ford Crestline vs. 2006 Saturn Vue
To start off, 2006 Saturn Vue is newer by 54 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1952 Ford Crestline. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1952 Ford Crestline would be higher. At 3,929 cc (8 cylinders), 1952 Ford Crestline is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Saturn Vue (250 HP @ 5800 RPM) has 142 more horse power than 1952 Ford Crestline. (108 HP @ 4500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2006 Saturn Vue should accelerate faster than 1952 Ford Crestline. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2006 Saturn Vue weights approximately 466 kg more than 1952 Ford Crestline. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2006 Saturn Vue is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1952 Ford Crestline. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2006 Saturn Vue will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1952 Ford Crestline | 2006 Saturn Vue | |
| Make | Ford | Saturn |
| Model | Crestline | Vue |
| Year Released | 1952 | 2006 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 3929 cc | 3474 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | V |
| Horse Power | 108 HP | 250 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4500 RPM | 5800 RPM |
| Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
| Vehicle Weight | 1480 kg | 1946 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5030 mm | 4610 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1890 mm | 1820 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2940 mm | 2710 mm |
