1952 Ford Crestline vs. 2007 Toyota RAV4
To start off, 2007 Toyota RAV4 is newer by 55 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1952 Ford Crestline. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1952 Ford Crestline would be higher. At 3,929 cc (8 cylinders), 1952 Ford Crestline is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2007 Toyota RAV4 (123 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 15 more horse power than 1952 Ford Crestline. (108 HP @ 4500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2007 Toyota RAV4 should accelerate faster than 1952 Ford Crestline. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1952 Ford Crestline weights approximately 274 kg more than 2007 Toyota RAV4.
Because 1952 Ford Crestline is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1952 Ford Crestline. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2007 Toyota RAV4, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1952 Ford Crestline | 2007 Toyota RAV4 | |
Make | Ford | Toyota |
Model | Crestline | RAV4 |
Year Released | 1952 | 2007 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3929 cc | 1794 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 108 HP | 123 HP |
Engine RPM | 4500 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline - Premium |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 1480 kg | 1206 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5030 mm | 4210 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1890 mm | 1740 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2940 mm | 2290 mm |