1952 Ford Crestline vs. 2008 Mazda RX-8
To start off, 2008 Mazda RX-8 is newer by 56 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1952 Ford Crestline. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1952 Ford Crestline would be higher. At 3,929 cc (8 cylinders), 1952 Ford Crestline is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2008 Mazda RX-8 (189 HP @ 7000 RPM) has 81 more horse power than 1952 Ford Crestline. (108 HP @ 4500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2008 Mazda RX-8 should accelerate faster than 1952 Ford Crestline. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1952 Ford Crestline weights approximately 58 kg more than 2008 Mazda RX-8.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1952 Ford Crestline | 2008 Mazda RX-8 | |
| Make | Ford | Mazda |
| Model | Crestline | RX-8 |
| Year Released | 1952 | 2008 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 3929 cc | 1308 cc |
| Engine Type | V | dual-disk rotary |
| Horse Power | 108 HP | 189 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4500 RPM | 7000 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline - Premium |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Vehicle Weight | 1480 kg | 1422 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5030 mm | 4440 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1890 mm | 1780 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2940 mm | 2710 mm |
