1952 Ford Crestline vs. 2009 Mazda RX-8
To start off, 2009 Mazda RX-8 is newer by 57 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1952 Ford Crestline. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1952 Ford Crestline would be higher. At 3,929 cc (8 cylinders), 1952 Ford Crestline is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Mazda RX-8 (229 HP @ 8500 RPM) has 121 more horse power than 1952 Ford Crestline. (108 HP @ 4500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2009 Mazda RX-8 should accelerate faster than 1952 Ford Crestline. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1952 Ford Crestline weights approximately 55 kg more than 2009 Mazda RX-8.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1952 Ford Crestline | 2009 Mazda RX-8 | |
| Make | Ford | Mazda |
| Model | Crestline | RX-8 |
| Year Released | 1952 | 2009 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 3929 cc | 1299 cc |
| Engine Type | V | dual-disk rotary |
| Horse Power | 108 HP | 229 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4500 RPM | 8500 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Vehicle Weight | 1480 kg | 1425 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5030 mm | 4440 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1890 mm | 1780 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2940 mm | 2710 mm |
