1952 Ford Crestline vs. 2009 Nissan Titan
To start off, 2009 Nissan Titan is newer by 57 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1952 Ford Crestline. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1952 Ford Crestline would be higher. At 5,551 cc (8 cylinders), 2009 Nissan Titan is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Nissan Titan (317 HP @ 5200 RPM) has 209 more horse power than 1952 Ford Crestline. (108 HP @ 4500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2009 Nissan Titan should accelerate faster than 1952 Ford Crestline.
Because 2009 Nissan Titan is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1952 Ford Crestline. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Nissan Titan will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 2009 Nissan Titan has automatic transmission and 1952 Ford Crestline has manual transmission. 1952 Ford Crestline will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2009 Nissan Titan will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
1952 Ford Crestline | 2009 Nissan Titan | |
Make | Ford | Nissan |
Model | Crestline | Titan |
Year Released | 1952 | 2009 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3929 cc | 5551 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 108 HP | 317 HP |
Engine RPM | 4500 RPM | 5200 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
Vehicle Length | 5030 mm | 5710 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1890 mm | 2030 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2940 mm | 3560 mm |