1952 Ford Crestline vs. 2009 Renault Scenic
To start off, 2009 Renault Scenic is newer by 57 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1952 Ford Crestline. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1952 Ford Crestline would be higher. At 3,929 cc (8 cylinders), 1952 Ford Crestline is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Renault Scenic (118 HP @ 4000 RPM) has 10 more horse power than 1952 Ford Crestline. (108 HP @ 4500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2009 Renault Scenic should accelerate faster than 1952 Ford Crestline. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1952 Ford Crestline weights approximately 265 kg more than 2009 Renault Scenic.
Because 1952 Ford Crestline is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1952 Ford Crestline. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Renault Scenic, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1952 Ford Crestline | 2009 Renault Scenic | |
| Make | Ford | Renault |
| Model | Crestline | Scenic |
| Year Released | 1952 | 2009 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 3929 cc | 1868 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 108 HP | 118 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4500 RPM | 4000 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Vehicle Weight | 1480 kg | 1215 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5030 mm | 4270 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1890 mm | 1630 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2940 mm | 2690 mm |
