1952 Ford Crestline vs. 2009 Saab 03-Sep
To start off, 2009 Saab 03-Sep is newer by 57 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1952 Ford Crestline. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1952 Ford Crestline would be higher. At 3,929 cc (8 cylinders), 1952 Ford Crestline is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Saab 03-Sep (207 HP @ 5500 RPM) has 99 more horse power than 1952 Ford Crestline. (108 HP @ 4500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2009 Saab 03-Sep should accelerate faster than 1952 Ford Crestline.
Because 1952 Ford Crestline is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1952 Ford Crestline. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Saab 03-Sep, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 2009 Saab 03-Sep has automatic transmission and 1952 Ford Crestline has manual transmission. 1952 Ford Crestline will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2009 Saab 03-Sep will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
1952 Ford Crestline | 2009 Saab 03-Sep | |
Make | Ford | Saab |
Model | Crestline | 03-Sep |
Year Released | 1952 | 2009 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3929 cc | 1998 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 108 HP | 207 HP |
Engine RPM | 4500 RPM | 5500 RPM |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
Vehicle Length | 5030 mm | 4850 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2940 mm | 2710 mm |