1952 Ford Crestline vs. 2010 Chevrolet Cobalt
To start off, 2010 Chevrolet Cobalt is newer by 58 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1952 Ford Crestline. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1952 Ford Crestline would be higher. At 3,929 cc (8 cylinders), 1952 Ford Crestline is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Chevrolet Cobalt (261 HP @ 5300 RPM) has 153 more horse power than 1952 Ford Crestline. (108 HP @ 4500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Chevrolet Cobalt should accelerate faster than 1952 Ford Crestline. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1952 Ford Crestline weights approximately 219 kg more than 2010 Chevrolet Cobalt.
Because 1952 Ford Crestline is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1952 Ford Crestline. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2010 Chevrolet Cobalt, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1952 Ford Crestline | 2010 Chevrolet Cobalt | |
Make | Ford | Chevrolet |
Model | Crestline | Cobalt |
Year Released | 1952 | 2010 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3929 cc | 1999 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 108 HP | 261 HP |
Engine RPM | 4500 RPM | 5300 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 1480 kg | 1261 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5030 mm | 4590 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1890 mm | 1730 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2940 mm | 2630 mm |