1952 Ford Crestline vs. 2010 Kia Carnival

To start off, 2010 Kia Carnival is newer by 58 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1952 Ford Crestline. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1952 Ford Crestline would be higher. At 3,929 cc (8 cylinders), 1952 Ford Crestline is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Kia Carnival (142 HP @ 8800 RPM) has 34 more horse power than 1952 Ford Crestline. (108 HP @ 4500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Kia Carnival should accelerate faster than 1952 Ford Crestline. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2010 Kia Carnival weights approximately 740 kg more than 1952 Ford Crestline. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Because 1952 Ford Crestline is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1952 Ford Crestline. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2010 Kia Carnival, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 2010 Kia Carnival has automatic transmission and 1952 Ford Crestline has manual transmission. 1952 Ford Crestline will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2010 Kia Carnival will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.

Compare all specifications: