1952 Ford Crestline vs. 2012 Cadillac CTS
To start off, 2012 Cadillac CTS is newer by 60 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1952 Ford Crestline. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1952 Ford Crestline would be higher. At 3,929 cc (8 cylinders), 1952 Ford Crestline is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2012 Cadillac CTS (270 HP @ 7000 RPM) has 162 more horse power than 1952 Ford Crestline. (108 HP @ 4500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2012 Cadillac CTS should accelerate faster than 1952 Ford Crestline. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2012 Cadillac CTS weights approximately 268 kg more than 1952 Ford Crestline. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1952 Ford Crestline | 2012 Cadillac CTS | |
| Make | Ford | Cadillac |
| Model | Crestline | CTS |
| Year Released | 1952 | 2012 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 3929 cc | 3000 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | V |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 108 HP | 270 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4500 RPM | 7000 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | 6-speed manual |
| Vehicle Weight | 1480 kg | 1748 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5030 mm | 4859 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1890 mm | 1842 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2940 mm | 2880 mm |
