1952 Ford Vedette vs. 1997 Renault Helem
To start off, 1997 Renault Helem is newer by 45 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1952 Ford Vedette. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1952 Ford Vedette would be higher. At 2,975 cc (6 cylinders), 1997 Renault Helem is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1997 Renault Helem (510 HP) has 444 more horse power than 1952 Ford Vedette. (66 HP) In normal driving conditions, 1997 Renault Helem should accelerate faster than 1952 Ford Vedette. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1997 Renault Helem weights approximately 525 kg more than 1952 Ford Vedette. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1952 Ford Vedette (122 Nm) has 37 more torque (in Nm) than 1997 Renault Helem. (85 Nm). This means 1952 Ford Vedette will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1997 Renault Helem.
Compare all specifications:
| 1952 Ford Vedette | 1997 Renault Helem | |
| Make | Ford | Renault |
| Model | Vedette | Helem |
| Year Released | 1952 | 1997 |
| Engine Position | Front | Middle |
| Engine Size | 2157 cc | 2975 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | V |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 66 HP | 510 HP |
| Torque | 122 Nm | 85 Nm |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1125 kg | 1650 kg |
| Wheelbase Size | 2700 mm | 2680 mm |
