1952 Ford Zephyr vs. 2005 MCC Crossblade
To start off, 2005 MCC Crossblade is newer by 53 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1952 Ford Zephyr. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1952 Ford Zephyr would be higher. At 2,260 cc (6 cylinders), 1952 Ford Zephyr is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 MCC Crossblade (70 HP) has 13 more horse power than 1952 Ford Zephyr. (57 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2005 MCC Crossblade should accelerate faster than 1952 Ford Zephyr. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1952 Ford Zephyr weights approximately 401 kg more than 2005 MCC Crossblade.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1952 Ford Zephyr (151 Nm @ 2000 RPM) has 49 more torque (in Nm) than 2005 MCC Crossblade. (102 Nm @ 3210 RPM). This means 1952 Ford Zephyr will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2005 MCC Crossblade.
Compare all specifications:
| 1952 Ford Zephyr | 2005 MCC Crossblade | |
| Make | Ford | MCC |
| Model | Zephyr | Crossblade |
| Year Released | 1952 | 2005 |
| Engine Size | 2260 cc | 599 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 3 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 57 HP | 70 HP |
| Torque | 151 Nm | 102 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 2000 RPM | 3210 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Vehicle Weight | 1145 kg | 744 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4370 mm | 2630 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1630 mm | 1630 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1520 mm | 1520 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2650 mm | 1810 mm |
