1952 Ford Zephyr vs. 2010 Audi R8
To start off, 2010 Audi R8 is newer by 58 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1952 Ford Zephyr. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1952 Ford Zephyr would be higher. At 4,200 cc (8 cylinders), 2010 Audi R8 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Audi R8 (420 HP @ 7800 RPM) has 363 more horse power than 1952 Ford Zephyr. (57 HP @ 4000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Audi R8 should accelerate faster than 1952 Ford Zephyr.
Because 2010 Audi R8 is all wheel drive (AWD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1952 Ford Zephyr. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2010 Audi R8 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2010 Audi R8 (429 Nm @ 4500 RPM) has 278 more torque (in Nm) than 1952 Ford Zephyr. (151 Nm @ 2000 RPM). This means 2010 Audi R8 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1952 Ford Zephyr.
Compare all specifications:
| 1952 Ford Zephyr | 2010 Audi R8 | |
| Make | Ford | Audi |
| Model | Zephyr | R8 |
| Year Released | 1952 | 2010 |
| Engine Position | Front | Middle |
| Engine Size | 2260 cc | 4200 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 57 HP | 420 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 7800 RPM |
| Torque | 151 Nm | 429 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 2000 RPM | 4500 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline - Premium |
| Drive Type | Rear | AWD |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
| Number of Doors | 4 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Length | 4370 mm | 4435 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1630 mm | 1905 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1520 mm | 1252 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2650 mm | 2649 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 40 L | 90 L |
