1952 GAZ M-20 vs. 1992 Mazda 323
To start off, 1992 Mazda 323 is newer by 40 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1952 GAZ M-20. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1952 GAZ M-20 would be higher. At 2,120 cc (4 cylinders), 1952 GAZ M-20 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1992 Mazda 323 (185 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 134 more horse power than 1952 GAZ M-20. (51 HP @ 3600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1992 Mazda 323 should accelerate faster than 1952 GAZ M-20. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1952 GAZ M-20 weights approximately 230 kg more than 1992 Mazda 323.
Because 1992 Mazda 323 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1952 GAZ M-20. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1992 Mazda 323 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1992 Mazda 323 (235 Nm @ 4500 RPM) has 110 more torque (in Nm) than 1952 GAZ M-20. (125 Nm @ 2200 RPM). This means 1992 Mazda 323 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1952 GAZ M-20.
Compare all specifications:
1952 GAZ M-20 | 1992 Mazda 323 | |
Make | GAZ | Mazda |
Model | M-20 | 323 |
Year Released | 1952 | 1992 |
Engine Size | 2120 cc | 1840 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 51 HP | 185 HP |
Engine RPM | 3600 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 125 Nm | 235 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2200 RPM | 4500 RPM |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 1460 kg | 1230 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4670 mm | 4090 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1900 mm | 1700 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1650 mm | 1400 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2710 mm | 2370 mm |