1952 GAZ M-20 vs. 1996 Opel Omega
To start off, 1996 Opel Omega is newer by 44 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1952 GAZ M-20. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1952 GAZ M-20 would be higher. At 2,120 cc (4 cylinders), 1952 GAZ M-20 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1996 Opel Omega (114 HP @ 5400 RPM) has 63 more horse power than 1952 GAZ M-20. (51 HP @ 3600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1996 Opel Omega should accelerate faster than 1952 GAZ M-20. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1952 GAZ M-20 weights approximately 30 kg more than 1996 Opel Omega.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1996 Opel Omega (178 Nm @ 2800 RPM) has 53 more torque (in Nm) than 1952 GAZ M-20. (125 Nm @ 2200 RPM). This means 1996 Opel Omega will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1952 GAZ M-20.
Compare all specifications:
1952 GAZ M-20 | 1996 Opel Omega | |
Make | GAZ | Opel |
Model | M-20 | Omega |
Year Released | 1952 | 1996 |
Engine Size | 2120 cc | 1998 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 51 HP | 114 HP |
Engine RPM | 3600 RPM | 5400 RPM |
Torque | 125 Nm | 178 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2200 RPM | 2800 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 1460 kg | 1430 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4670 mm | 4790 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1900 mm | 1790 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1650 mm | 1460 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2710 mm | 2740 mm |