1952 GAZ M-20 vs. 1998 Kia Elan
To start off, 1998 Kia Elan is newer by 46 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1952 GAZ M-20. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1952 GAZ M-20 would be higher. At 2,120 cc (4 cylinders), 1952 GAZ M-20 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1998 Kia Elan (151 HP) has 100 more horse power than 1952 GAZ M-20. (51 HP) In normal driving conditions, 1998 Kia Elan should accelerate faster than 1952 GAZ M-20.
Because 1952 GAZ M-20 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1952 GAZ M-20. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1998 Kia Elan, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1998 Kia Elan (186 Nm) has 61 more torque (in Nm) than 1952 GAZ M-20. (125 Nm). This means 1998 Kia Elan will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1952 GAZ M-20.
Compare all specifications:
1952 GAZ M-20 | 1998 Kia Elan | |
Make | GAZ | Kia |
Model | M-20 | Elan |
Year Released | 1952 | 1998 |
Engine Size | 2120 cc | 1793 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 51 HP | 151 HP |
Torque | 125 Nm | 186 Nm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Length | 4670 mm | 3890 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1900 mm | 1730 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1650 mm | 1280 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2710 mm | 2270 mm |