1952 GAZ M-20 vs. 2003 MCC Smart
To start off, 2003 MCC Smart is newer by 51 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1952 GAZ M-20. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1952 GAZ M-20 would be higher. At 2,120 cc (4 cylinders), 1952 GAZ M-20 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2003 MCC Smart (73 HP) has 22 more horse power than 1952 GAZ M-20. (51 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2003 MCC Smart should accelerate faster than 1952 GAZ M-20. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1952 GAZ M-20 weights approximately 495 kg more than 2003 MCC Smart.
Because 1952 GAZ M-20 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1952 GAZ M-20. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2003 MCC Smart, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1952 GAZ M-20 (125 Nm) has 25 more torque (in Nm) than 2003 MCC Smart. (100 Nm). This means 1952 GAZ M-20 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2003 MCC Smart.
Compare all specifications:
1952 GAZ M-20 | 2003 MCC Smart | |
Make | GAZ | MCC |
Model | M-20 | Smart |
Year Released | 1952 | 2003 |
Engine Size | 2120 cc | 1124 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 3 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 51 HP | 73 HP |
Torque | 125 Nm | 100 Nm |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 1460 kg | 965 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4670 mm | 3760 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1900 mm | 1690 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1650 mm | 1460 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2710 mm | 2510 mm |