1952 GAZ M-20 vs. 2010 Audi A3
To start off, 2010 Audi A3 is newer by 58 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1952 GAZ M-20. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1952 GAZ M-20 would be higher. At 2,120 cc (4 cylinders), 1952 GAZ M-20 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Audi A3 (140 HP @ 4200 RPM) has 89 more horse power than 1952 GAZ M-20. (51 HP @ 3600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Audi A3 should accelerate faster than 1952 GAZ M-20.
Because 1952 GAZ M-20 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1952 GAZ M-20. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2010 Audi A3, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2010 Audi A3 (320 Nm @ 1750 RPM) has 195 more torque (in Nm) than 1952 GAZ M-20. (125 Nm @ 2200 RPM). This means 2010 Audi A3 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1952 GAZ M-20.
Compare all specifications:
| 1952 GAZ M-20 | 2010 Audi A3 | |
| Make | GAZ | Audi |
| Model | M-20 | A3 |
| Year Released | 1952 | 2010 |
| Engine Size | 2120 cc | 2000 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 51 HP | 140 HP |
| Engine RPM | 3600 RPM | 4200 RPM |
| Torque | 125 Nm | 320 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 2200 RPM | 1750 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Vehicle Length | 4670 mm | 4293 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1900 mm | 1765 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1650 mm | 1422 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2710 mm | 2578 mm |
