1952 GAZ M-20 vs. 2010 Holden Cruze
To start off, 2010 Holden Cruze is newer by 58 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1952 GAZ M-20. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1952 GAZ M-20 would be higher. At 2,120 cc (4 cylinders), 1952 GAZ M-20 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Holden Cruze (110 HP) has 59 more horse power than 1952 GAZ M-20. (51 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Holden Cruze should accelerate faster than 1952 GAZ M-20.
Because 1952 GAZ M-20 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1952 GAZ M-20. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2010 Holden Cruze, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2010 Holden Cruze (153 Nm) has 28 more torque (in Nm) than 1952 GAZ M-20. (125 Nm). This means 2010 Holden Cruze will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1952 GAZ M-20.
Compare all specifications:
| 1952 GAZ M-20 | 2010 Holden Cruze | |
| Make | GAZ | Holden |
| Model | M-20 | Cruze |
| Year Released | 1952 | 2010 |
| Engine Size | 2120 cc | 1598 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 51 HP | 110 HP |
| Torque | 125 Nm | 153 Nm |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Vehicle Length | 4670 mm | 4597 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1900 mm | 1788 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1650 mm | 1477 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2710 mm | 2685 mm |
