1952 Holden FX vs. 1948 Volvo PV 60
To start off, 1952 Holden FX is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1948 Volvo PV 60. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1948 Volvo PV 60 would be higher. At 3,670 cc (6 cylinders), 1948 Volvo PV 60 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1948 Volvo PV 60 (85 HP) has 34 more horse power than 1952 Holden FX. (51 HP) In normal driving conditions, 1948 Volvo PV 60 should accelerate faster than 1952 Holden FX. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1948 Volvo PV 60 weights approximately 660 kg more than 1952 Holden FX. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1952 Holden FX | 1948 Volvo PV 60 | |
Make | Holden | Volvo |
Model | FX | PV 60 |
Year Released | 1952 | 1948 |
Engine Size | 2166 cc | 3670 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 51 HP | 85 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 970 kg | 1630 kg |
Wheelbase Size | 2620 mm | 2850 mm |