1952 Holden FX vs. 1956 Rolls-Royce Phantom
To start off, 1956 Rolls-Royce Phantom is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1952 Holden FX. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1952 Holden FX would be higher.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1952 Holden FX | 1956 Rolls-Royce Phantom | |
Make | Holden | Rolls-Royce |
Model | FX | Phantom |
Year Released | 1952 | 1956 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 51 HP | 0 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Vehicle Width | 1710 mm | 1960 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2620 mm | 3690 mm |