1952 Holden FX vs. 1959 Triumph Herald
To start off, 1959 Triumph Herald is newer by 7 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1952 Holden FX. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1952 Holden FX would be higher. At 2,166 cc (6 cylinders), 1952 Holden FX is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1952 Holden FX (51 HP) has 16 more horse power than 1959 Triumph Herald. (35 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1952 Holden FX should accelerate faster than 1959 Triumph Herald. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1952 Holden FX weights approximately 210 kg more than 1959 Triumph Herald. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 1952 Holden FX (136 Nm @ 2000 RPM) has 67 more torque (in Nm) than 1959 Triumph Herald. (69 Nm @ 2750 RPM). This means 1952 Holden FX will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1959 Triumph Herald.
Compare all specifications:
1952 Holden FX | 1959 Triumph Herald | |
Make | Holden | Triumph |
Model | FX | Herald |
Year Released | 1952 | 1959 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2166 cc | 947 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 51 HP | 35 HP |
Torque | 136 Nm | 69 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2000 RPM | 2750 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Vehicle Weight | 970 kg | 760 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4380 mm | 3890 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1710 mm | 1530 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1580 mm | 1510 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2620 mm | 2320 mm |