1952 Holden FX vs. 1962 Lotus Elan
To start off, 1962 Lotus Elan is newer by 10 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1952 Holden FX. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1952 Holden FX would be higher. At 2,166 cc (6 cylinders), 1952 Holden FX is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1962 Lotus Elan (100 HP) has 49 more horse power than 1952 Holden FX. (51 HP) In normal driving conditions, 1962 Lotus Elan should accelerate faster than 1952 Holden FX. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1952 Holden FX weights approximately 380 kg more than 1962 Lotus Elan.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1962 Lotus Elan (138 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 2 more torque (in Nm) than 1952 Holden FX. (136 Nm @ 2000 RPM). This means 1962 Lotus Elan will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1952 Holden FX.
Compare all specifications:
1952 Holden FX | 1962 Lotus Elan | |
Make | Holden | Lotus |
Model | FX | Elan |
Year Released | 1952 | 1962 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2166 cc | 1496 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 51 HP | 100 HP |
Torque | 136 Nm | 138 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2000 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 970 kg | 590 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4380 mm | 3700 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1710 mm | 1430 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1580 mm | 1110 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2620 mm | 2140 mm |