1952 Holden FX vs. 1962 Nissan Cedric
To start off, 1962 Nissan Cedric is newer by 10 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1952 Holden FX. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1952 Holden FX would be higher. At 2,166 cc (6 cylinders), 1952 Holden FX is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1962 Nissan Cedric (60 HP) has 9 more horse power than 1952 Holden FX. (51 HP) In normal driving conditions, 1962 Nissan Cedric should accelerate faster than 1952 Holden FX. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1952 Holden FX weights approximately 40 kg more than 1962 Nissan Cedric.
Let's talk about torque, 1952 Holden FX (136 Nm @ 2000 RPM) has 21 more torque (in Nm) than 1962 Nissan Cedric. (115 Nm @ 3200 RPM). This means 1952 Holden FX will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1962 Nissan Cedric.
Compare all specifications:
| 1952 Holden FX | 1962 Nissan Cedric | |
| Make | Holden | Nissan |
| Model | FX | Cedric |
| Year Released | 1952 | 1962 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2166 cc | 1488 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 51 HP | 60 HP |
| Torque | 136 Nm | 115 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 2000 RPM | 3200 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Vehicle Weight | 970 kg | 930 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4380 mm | 4420 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1710 mm | 1690 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1580 mm | 1530 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2620 mm | 2540 mm |
