1952 Holden FX vs. 1964 Renault Dauphine
To start off, 1964 Renault Dauphine is newer by 12 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1952 Holden FX. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1952 Holden FX would be higher. At 2,166 cc (6 cylinders), 1952 Holden FX is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1952 Holden FX (51 HP) has 13 more horse power than 1964 Renault Dauphine. (38 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1952 Holden FX should accelerate faster than 1964 Renault Dauphine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1952 Holden FX weights approximately 338 kg more than 1964 Renault Dauphine. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 1952 Holden FX (136 Nm) has 79 more torque (in Nm) than 1964 Renault Dauphine. (57 Nm). This means 1952 Holden FX will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1964 Renault Dauphine.
Compare all specifications:
| 1952 Holden FX | 1964 Renault Dauphine | |
| Make | Holden | Renault |
| Model | FX | Dauphine |
| Year Released | 1952 | 1964 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2166 cc | 845 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 51 HP | 38 HP |
| Torque | 136 Nm | 57 Nm |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Vehicle Weight | 970 kg | 632 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4380 mm | 3950 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1710 mm | 1530 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1580 mm | 1450 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2620 mm | 2280 mm |
