1952 Holden FX vs. 1964 Toyota Crown
To start off, 1964 Toyota Crown is newer by 12 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1952 Holden FX. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1952 Holden FX would be higher. At 2,599 cc, 1964 Toyota Crown is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1964 Toyota Crown (98 HP) has 47 more horse power than 1952 Holden FX. (51 HP) In normal driving conditions, 1964 Toyota Crown should accelerate faster than 1952 Holden FX. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1964 Toyota Crown weights approximately 405 kg more than 1952 Holden FX. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 1964 Toyota Crown (200 Nm @ 3000 RPM) has 64 more torque (in Nm) than 1952 Holden FX. (136 Nm @ 2000 RPM). This means 1964 Toyota Crown will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1952 Holden FX.
Compare all specifications:
1952 Holden FX | 1964 Toyota Crown | |
Make | Holden | Toyota |
Model | FX | Crown |
Year Released | 1952 | 1964 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2166 cc | 2599 cc |
Horse Power | 51 HP | 98 HP |
Torque | 136 Nm | 200 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2000 RPM | 3000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Vehicle Weight | 970 kg | 1375 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4380 mm | 4730 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1710 mm | 1850 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1580 mm | 1470 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2620 mm | 2750 mm |