1952 Holden FX vs. 1967 Riley 4
To start off, 1967 Riley 4 is newer by 15 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1952 Holden FX. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1952 Holden FX would be higher. At 2,166 cc (6 cylinders), 1952 Holden FX is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1967 Riley 4 (67 HP) has 16 more horse power than 1952 Holden FX. (51 HP) In normal driving conditions, 1967 Riley 4 should accelerate faster than 1952 Holden FX. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1967 Riley 4 weights approximately 178 kg more than 1952 Holden FX. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1952 Holden FX (136 Nm @ 2000 RPM) has 16 more torque (in Nm) than 1967 Riley 4. (120 Nm @ 2500 RPM). This means 1952 Holden FX will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1967 Riley 4.
Compare all specifications:
1952 Holden FX | 1967 Riley 4 | |
Make | Holden | Riley |
Model | FX | 4 |
Year Released | 1952 | 1967 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2166 cc | 1622 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 51 HP | 67 HP |
Torque | 136 Nm | 120 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2000 RPM | 2500 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Vehicle Weight | 970 kg | 1148 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4380 mm | 4540 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1710 mm | 1620 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1580 mm | 1530 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2620 mm | 2530 mm |