1952 Holden FX vs. 1969 Zastava 850 K
To start off, 1969 Zastava 850 K is newer by 17 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1952 Holden FX. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1952 Holden FX would be higher. At 2,166 cc (6 cylinders), 1952 Holden FX is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1952 Holden FX (51 HP) has 16 more horse power than 1969 Zastava 850 K. (35 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1952 Holden FX should accelerate faster than 1969 Zastava 850 K. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1952 Holden FX weights approximately 115 kg more than 1969 Zastava 850 K. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1952 Holden FX | 1969 Zastava 850 K | |
Make | Holden | Zastava |
Model | FX | 850 K |
Year Released | 1952 | 1969 |
Engine Size | 2166 cc | 846 cc |
Horse Power | 51 HP | 35 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Vehicle Weight | 970 kg | 855 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4380 mm | 3740 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1710 mm | 1490 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1580 mm | 1700 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2620 mm | 2010 mm |