1952 Holden FX vs. 1970 ZIL 114
To start off, 1970 ZIL 114 is newer by 18 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1952 Holden FX. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1952 Holden FX would be higher. At 6,998 cc (8 cylinders), 1970 ZIL 114 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1970 ZIL 114 (254 HP) has 203 more horse power than 1952 Holden FX. (51 HP) In normal driving conditions, 1970 ZIL 114 should accelerate faster than 1952 Holden FX. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1970 ZIL 114 weights approximately 2205 kg more than 1952 Holden FX. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1970 ZIL 114 (580 Nm @ 2900 RPM) has 444 more torque (in Nm) than 1952 Holden FX. (136 Nm @ 2000 RPM). This means 1970 ZIL 114 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1952 Holden FX.
Compare all specifications:
1952 Holden FX | 1970 ZIL 114 | |
Make | Holden | ZIL |
Model | FX | 114 |
Year Released | 1952 | 1970 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2166 cc | 6998 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 51 HP | 254 HP |
Torque | 136 Nm | 580 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2000 RPM | 2900 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Vehicle Weight | 970 kg | 3175 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4380 mm | 6300 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1710 mm | 2080 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1580 mm | 1520 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2620 mm | 3770 mm |