1952 Holden FX vs. 1974 Audi Fox
To start off, 1974 Audi Fox is newer by 22 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1952 Holden FX. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1952 Holden FX would be higher. At 2,166 cc (6 cylinders), 1952 Holden FX is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1974 Audi Fox (75 HP) has 24 more horse power than 1952 Holden FX. (51 HP) In normal driving conditions, 1974 Audi Fox should accelerate faster than 1952 Holden FX. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1952 Holden FX weights approximately 58 kg more than 1974 Audi Fox.
Because 1952 Holden FX is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1952 Holden FX. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1974 Audi Fox, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1952 Holden FX (136 Nm @ 2000 RPM) has 24 more torque (in Nm) than 1974 Audi Fox. (112 Nm @ 3200 RPM). This means 1952 Holden FX will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1974 Audi Fox.
Compare all specifications:
1952 Holden FX | 1974 Audi Fox | |
Make | Holden | Audi |
Model | FX | Fox |
Year Released | 1952 | 1974 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2166 cc | 1588 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 51 HP | 75 HP |
Torque | 136 Nm | 112 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2000 RPM | 3200 RPM |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 970 kg | 912 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4380 mm | 4390 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1710 mm | 1690 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1580 mm | 1370 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2620 mm | 2550 mm |