1952 Holden FX vs. 1974 Lotus Eclat
To start off, 1974 Lotus Eclat is newer by 22 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1952 Holden FX. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1952 Holden FX would be higher. At 2,166 cc (6 cylinders), 1952 Holden FX is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1974 Lotus Eclat (160 HP) has 109 more horse power than 1952 Holden FX. (51 HP) In normal driving conditions, 1974 Lotus Eclat should accelerate faster than 1952 Holden FX. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1974 Lotus Eclat weights approximately 10 kg more than 1952 Holden FX. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1974 Lotus Eclat (191 Nm @ 4900 RPM) has 55 more torque (in Nm) than 1952 Holden FX. (136 Nm @ 2000 RPM). This means 1974 Lotus Eclat will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1952 Holden FX.
Compare all specifications:
1952 Holden FX | 1974 Lotus Eclat | |
Make | Holden | Lotus |
Model | FX | Eclat |
Year Released | 1952 | 1974 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2166 cc | 1973 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 51 HP | 160 HP |
Torque | 136 Nm | 191 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2000 RPM | 4900 RPM |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 970 kg | 980 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4380 mm | 4460 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1710 mm | 1820 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1580 mm | 1200 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2620 mm | 2440 mm |