1952 Holden FX vs. 1975 Mitsubishi Celeste
To start off, 1975 Mitsubishi Celeste is newer by 23 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1952 Holden FX. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1952 Holden FX would be higher. At 2,166 cc (6 cylinders), 1952 Holden FX is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1975 Mitsubishi Celeste (79 HP) has 28 more horse power than 1952 Holden FX. (51 HP) In normal driving conditions, 1975 Mitsubishi Celeste should accelerate faster than 1952 Holden FX. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1952 Holden FX weights approximately 55 kg more than 1975 Mitsubishi Celeste.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1952 Holden FX (136 Nm @ 2000 RPM) has 19 more torque (in Nm) than 1975 Mitsubishi Celeste. (117 Nm @ 3800 RPM). This means 1952 Holden FX will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1975 Mitsubishi Celeste.
Compare all specifications:
1952 Holden FX | 1975 Mitsubishi Celeste | |
Make | Holden | Mitsubishi |
Model | FX | Celeste |
Year Released | 1952 | 1975 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2166 cc | 1439 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 51 HP | 79 HP |
Torque | 136 Nm | 117 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2000 RPM | 3800 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 970 kg | 915 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4380 mm | 4160 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1710 mm | 1620 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1580 mm | 1350 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2620 mm | 2350 mm |