1952 Holden FX vs. 1976 Volvo 66
To start off, 1976 Volvo 66 is newer by 24 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1952 Holden FX. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1952 Holden FX would be higher. At 2,166 cc (6 cylinders), 1952 Holden FX is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1976 Volvo 66 (56 HP) has 5 more horse power than 1952 Holden FX. (51 HP) In normal driving conditions, 1976 Volvo 66 should accelerate faster than 1952 Holden FX.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1952 Holden FX (136 Nm @ 2000 RPM) has 42 more torque (in Nm) than 1976 Volvo 66. (94 Nm @ 2800 RPM). This means 1952 Holden FX will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1976 Volvo 66.
Compare all specifications:
1952 Holden FX | 1976 Volvo 66 | |
Make | Holden | Volvo |
Model | FX | 66 |
Year Released | 1952 | 1976 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2166 cc | 1289 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 51 HP | 56 HP |
Torque | 136 Nm | 94 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2000 RPM | 2800 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Length | 4380 mm | 3910 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1710 mm | 1550 mm |