1952 Holden FX vs. 1979 Triumph Spitfire
To start off, 1979 Triumph Spitfire is newer by 27 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1952 Holden FX. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1952 Holden FX would be higher. At 2,166 cc (6 cylinders), 1952 Holden FX is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1979 Triumph Spitfire (57 HP) has 6 more horse power than 1952 Holden FX. (51 HP) In normal driving conditions, 1979 Triumph Spitfire should accelerate faster than 1952 Holden FX. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1952 Holden FX weights approximately 183 kg more than 1979 Triumph Spitfire.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1952 Holden FX (136 Nm) has 37 more torque (in Nm) than 1979 Triumph Spitfire. (99 Nm). This means 1952 Holden FX will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1979 Triumph Spitfire.
Compare all specifications:
1952 Holden FX | 1979 Triumph Spitfire | |
Make | Holden | Triumph |
Model | FX | Spitfire |
Year Released | 1952 | 1979 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2166 cc | 1491 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 51 HP | 57 HP |
Torque | 136 Nm | 99 Nm |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 970 kg | 787 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4380 mm | 3790 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1710 mm | 1490 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1580 mm | 1210 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2620 mm | 2110 mm |