1952 Holden FX vs. 1980 Jaguar XJR
To start off, 1980 Jaguar XJR is newer by 28 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1952 Holden FX. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1952 Holden FX would be higher. At 5,342 cc (12 cylinders), 1980 Jaguar XJR is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1952 Holden FX weights approximately 70 kg more than 1980 Jaguar XJR.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1952 Holden FX | 1980 Jaguar XJR | |
| Make | Holden | Jaguar |
| Model | FX | XJR |
| Year Released | 1952 | 1980 |
| Engine Position | Front | Middle |
| Engine Size | 2166 cc | 5342 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 12 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 51 HP | 0 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Vehicle Weight | 970 kg | 900 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4380 mm | 4680 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1710 mm | 1990 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1580 mm | 1050 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2620 mm | 2870 mm |
