1952 Holden FX vs. 1980 Matra-Simca Murena
To start off, 1980 Matra-Simca Murena is newer by 28 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1952 Holden FX. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1952 Holden FX would be higher. At 2,166 cc (6 cylinders), 1952 Holden FX is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1980 Matra-Simca Murena (140 HP) has 89 more horse power than 1952 Holden FX. (51 HP) In normal driving conditions, 1980 Matra-Simca Murena should accelerate faster than 1952 Holden FX. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1980 Matra-Simca Murena weights approximately 81 kg more than 1952 Holden FX. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1952 Holden FX | 1980 Matra-Simca Murena | |
Make | Holden | Matra-Simca |
Model | FX | Murena |
Year Released | 1952 | 1980 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2166 cc | 2156 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 51 HP | 140 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 970 kg | 1051 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4380 mm | 4080 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2620 mm | 2440 mm |