1952 Holden FX vs. 1981 Opel Ascona
To start off, 1981 Opel Ascona is newer by 29 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1952 Holden FX. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1952 Holden FX would be higher. At 2,166 cc (6 cylinders), 1952 Holden FX is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1981 Opel Ascona (81 HP) has 30 more horse power than 1952 Holden FX. (51 HP) In normal driving conditions, 1981 Opel Ascona should accelerate faster than 1952 Holden FX. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1981 Opel Ascona weights approximately 44 kg more than 1952 Holden FX. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 1952 Holden FX (136 Nm @ 2000 RPM) has 2 more torque (in Nm) than 1981 Opel Ascona. (134 Nm @ 2600 RPM). This means 1952 Holden FX will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1981 Opel Ascona.
Compare all specifications:
1952 Holden FX | 1981 Opel Ascona | |
Make | Holden | Opel |
Model | FX | Ascona |
Year Released | 1952 | 1981 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2166 cc | 1598 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 51 HP | 81 HP |
Torque | 136 Nm | 134 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2000 RPM | 2600 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Vehicle Weight | 970 kg | 1014 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4380 mm | 4380 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1710 mm | 1680 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1580 mm | 1400 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2620 mm | 2580 mm |