1952 Holden FX vs. 1983 Nissan Bluebird

To start off, 1983 Nissan Bluebird is newer by 31 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1952 Holden FX. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1952 Holden FX would be higher. At 2,166 cc (6 cylinders), 1952 Holden FX is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1983 Nissan Bluebird (104 HP) has 53 more horse power than 1952 Holden FX. (51 HP) In normal driving conditions, 1983 Nissan Bluebird should accelerate faster than 1952 Holden FX. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1983 Nissan Bluebird weights approximately 200 kg more than 1952 Holden FX. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Because 1952 Holden FX is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1952 Holden FX. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1983 Nissan Bluebird, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1983 Nissan Bluebird (162 Nm @ 3600 RPM) has 26 more torque (in Nm) than 1952 Holden FX. (136 Nm @ 2000 RPM). This means 1983 Nissan Bluebird will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1952 Holden FX.

Compare all specifications: