1952 Holden FX vs. 1985 Plymouth Sundance
To start off, 1985 Plymouth Sundance is newer by 33 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1952 Holden FX. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1952 Holden FX would be higher. At 2,212 cc (4 cylinders), 1985 Plymouth Sundance is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1985 Plymouth Sundance (96 HP) has 45 more horse power than 1952 Holden FX. (51 HP) In normal driving conditions, 1985 Plymouth Sundance should accelerate faster than 1952 Holden FX. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1985 Plymouth Sundance weights approximately 205 kg more than 1952 Holden FX. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1952 Holden FX is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1952 Holden FX. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1985 Plymouth Sundance, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1952 Holden FX | 1985 Plymouth Sundance | |
Make | Holden | Plymouth |
Model | FX | Sundance |
Year Released | 1952 | 1985 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2166 cc | 2212 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 51 HP | 96 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Vehicle Weight | 970 kg | 1175 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4380 mm | 4370 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1710 mm | 1720 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2620 mm | 2470 mm |