1952 Holden FX vs. 1987 Toyota Lite Ace
To start off, 1987 Toyota Lite Ace is newer by 35 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1952 Holden FX. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1952 Holden FX would be higher. At 2,166 cc (6 cylinders), 1952 Holden FX is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1987 Toyota Lite Ace weights approximately 130 kg more than 1952 Holden FX.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1952 Holden FX | 1987 Toyota Lite Ace | |
Make | Holden | Toyota |
Model | FX | Lite Ace |
Year Released | 1952 | 1987 |
Engine Size | 2166 cc | 1451 cc |
Horse Power | 51 HP | 0 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 970 kg | 1100 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4380 mm | 4010 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1710 mm | 1660 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1580 mm | 1910 mm |