1952 Holden FX vs. 1990 Audi V8

To start off, 1990 Audi V8 is newer by 38 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1952 Holden FX. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1952 Holden FX would be higher. At 3,562 cc (8 cylinders), 1990 Audi V8 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1990 Audi V8 (247 HP) has 196 more horse power than 1952 Holden FX. (51 HP) In normal driving conditions, 1990 Audi V8 should accelerate faster than 1952 Holden FX. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1990 Audi V8 weights approximately 820 kg more than 1952 Holden FX. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Because 1990 Audi V8 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1952 Holden FX. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1990 Audi V8 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1990 Audi V8 (340 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 204 more torque (in Nm) than 1952 Holden FX. (136 Nm @ 2000 RPM). This means 1990 Audi V8 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1952 Holden FX. 1990 Audi V8 has automatic transmission and 1952 Holden FX has manual transmission. 1952 Holden FX will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 1990 Audi V8 will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.

Compare all specifications: