1952 Holden FX vs. 1990 Volvo 960

To start off, 1990 Volvo 960 is newer by 38 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1952 Holden FX. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1952 Holden FX would be higher. At 2,922 cc (6 cylinders), 1990 Volvo 960 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1990 Volvo 960 (204 HP) has 153 more horse power than 1952 Holden FX. (51 HP) In normal driving conditions, 1990 Volvo 960 should accelerate faster than 1952 Holden FX. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1990 Volvo 960 weights approximately 586 kg more than 1952 Holden FX. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1990 Volvo 960 (267 Nm @ 4300 RPM) has 131 more torque (in Nm) than 1952 Holden FX. (136 Nm @ 2000 RPM). This means 1990 Volvo 960 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1952 Holden FX.

Compare all specifications:

1952 Holden FX 1990 Volvo 960
Make Holden Volvo
Model FX 960
Year Released 1952 1990
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 2166 cc 2922 cc
Engine Cylinders 6 cylinders 6 cylinders
Engine Type in-line in-line
Valves per Cylinder 2 valves 4 valves
Horse Power 51 HP 204 HP
Torque 136 Nm 267 Nm
Torque RPM 2000 RPM 4300 RPM
Fuel Type Gasoline Gasoline
Drive Type Rear Rear
Transmission Type Manual Manual
Vehicle Weight 970 kg 1556 kg
Vehicle Length 4380 mm 4880 mm
Vehicle Width 1710 mm 1750 mm
Vehicle Height 1580 mm 1420 mm
Wheelbase Size 2620 mm 2650 mm